Minor
spoiler-of-the-obvious alert! Don’t you just hate it when a film that you’re
really enjoying, that has actors in it that you really love, has an abrupt
twist that doesn’t come off right and then charges straight into a flat ending?
Yeah, that sums
up nearly all of my reflections of this movie. Maybe I’m being hypercritical or looking at it too much with a writer’s eye, because someone I saw this movie
with agreed with me that the ending was flat but thought the twist that came
just before it worked.
I, however,
can’t help thinking that with the swapping of a couple of key elements, and the
removal of the flat (and extremely contrived just-to-leave-room-for-a-sequel
thus damaging the impact of the end of the first film) ending you would have an
exceptional story and a really good movie.
I don’t want to
give away any plot spoilers, and opinions on this one are divided. If it worked
for you, great. For me, the fundamental error here was that the point of view
throughout the movie was wrong. Fact. In a book with a protagonist like Watson
to Sherlock Holmes, set slightly to the side of the main character, this would
have been a brilliant story. Translate that onto film, with the point of view
remaining ever so slightly to the side of the main character, and you would
have had a winner.
Instead you have
a film with a huge reveal that did not reward or shock the audience to the
degree that it should have. Another reason for this is that the misdirection
throughout the film was too obvious – the viewer knows they are being
misdirected – the impact of which is that in the end they don’t believe any of
it to enough of a degree to invest emotionally. The reveal, therefore, does not
work.
When the film
got to the end I wanted to jump into the reel, wind it back about 5 minutes, do
a very quick re-write and switch the places of two characters, then let it
play. Abracadabra! (Oh yeah, had to get that in there!) I think you would have had an
extremely clever film, but more importantly, you would have had one that
rewarded the reader at the end and made their investment (time, concentration,
etc.) worth it.
Elloise Hopkins.